Ngunguru Sandspit Protection Society
 
 
Main Menu
Home
Content
All items
Key Resources
Articles by Topic
Events
Other Coastlines
Human Interest
Photo Gallery
Links
Navigation
Search
Index
Action
Contact / Donate / Join
Comment Page
Sandspit Prints
Secure Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Verse of The Day
“He whakawhetai tonu taku mahi ki toku Atua mo koutou, mo te aroha noa o te Atua kua homai nei ki a koutou i roto i a Karaiti Ihu; Kua meinga hoki kia hua nga mea katoa ma koutou i roto i a ia, te whakapuaki korero, te matauranga;” (1 Corinthians 1:4-5)

Powered by BibleGateway.com
Recent popular items
Tutukaka Coast promo
Home arrow Other Coastlines arrow Matapouri arrow Court hearing of land spat in public interest - judge
Court hearing of land spat in public interest - judge PDF Print
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Other Coastlines - Matapouri
Written by Mike Dinsdale, The Northern Advocate   
Tuesday, 20 January 2009

View towards Otito Reserve past Morrison House

The dispute over a survey of disputed land at Matapouri is of "significant public interest" that should be heard by the courts, an Associate High Court judge says.

Friends of Matapouri and Te Whanau o Rangiwhakaahu Hapu Charitable Trust have lodged High Court action against the Department of Conservation, Land Information New Zealand and the Attorney General, as well as the land's title-holders.

The dispute centres on 1.1ha of privately owned beachfront land at Matapouri which the groups want returned to Crown ownership. They say the property is worth about $10 million.

The groups said the land and its wahi tapu sites originally formed part of the O Tito Reserve but was wrongly converted to private ownership through a surveying error in 1999.

The land is owned by members of the Ringer family, including Val Monk, John Ringer and Martin Ringer, who say the property was bought legally by their grandfather Jock Morrison in 1912.

The first stage in the battle was heard in the High Court at Whangarei last month and in his just-released judgment, Associate Judge David Robinson ruled the questions to be resolved by the case were the following:

...at this stage it was not possible to do more than assess an impression of the merits of the groups' claim

"Is the boundary between O Tito reserve and the adjoining land defined correctly [by the surveyors]? And if the boundary ... is incorrect, where is the location of the correct boundary between the two parcels of land?"

Full story...

NZ Herald reprint


Add as favourites (157) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 1928

Be first to comment this article

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 
< Prev   Next >

Email: secretary@ncag.org.nz

© 2017 Ngunguru Sandspit Protection Society
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.